Executive compensation advisory across the US, UK, and EU — with detail on the pay legislation that shapes decisions in each jurisdiction.
Compensation questions arrive in different shapes and need different answers.
Market pages cover a city or region: who we work with there and the services that come up most often. Nonprofit pages do the same for boards and compensation committees, with Form 990–sourced benchmarks for that market. Salary data pages publish the underlying numbers for a whole state, by budget size, sector and package component. Compliance pages cover a jurisdiction’s pay legislation — who is covered, what has to be filed or disclosed, by when, and what happens if it isn’t.
Most organisations need more than one. A Boston nonprofit with a §4958 question and a Massachusetts posting obligation is reading three of these, not one.
Where a state has no pay transparency statute, we say so rather than manufacturing a compliance page — and explain what still applies to a remote posting that could be filled elsewhere.
One market per state, targeting that state’s largest metro, paired with statewide salary data and the compliance detail for that jurisdiction.
Benchmarks are Form 990–sourced and metro-adjusted. Compliance pages were verified July 2026 — re-confirm with counsel before acting, as several of these statutes were amended recently or have future effective dates.
Top-25 metros that are not the largest in their state, each with its own published median.
The UK operates one national framework, so it takes one page. In the EU the meaningful unit is the member state, because each transposes the Pay Transparency Directive into its own law on its own timetable.
Multi-jurisdiction pay questions are the ones we most enjoy. Send a note with where your people sit and we’ll come back with a view.
Tell us what you’re working through and we’ll follow up directly.